2011 Trail Conditions
#1
Posted 10 May 2011 - 04:38 PM
#2
Posted 10 May 2011 - 04:52 PM
--Aaron
#3
Posted 28 May 2011 - 03:01 PM
5/28, Lily Mountain - Patchy snow from 9100 feet through the trees. Not a problem, but it was strange to see snow there this late. Not unexpected given the weather, but strange anyway. The push to the top is clear and dry.
#4
Posted 30 May 2011 - 06:29 PM
#5
Posted 30 May 2011 - 08:25 PM
As you can see from the picture, the trail to Alberta Falls is still under probably four to five feet of snow. I was standing on the snow, looking down at where the area around the sign had been cleared by some helpful person.
The trail to Alberta Falls was mostly packed snow today, navigable without snowshoes. Crampons would have been nice, but the really steep spots are only problematic going downhill, so I just sat on my waterproof coat and slid down. (This was after I tried coming down from my failed attempt to Mills Lake and fell on one of those steep hills, then decided as long as my rear end was wet I might as well slide the rest of the way down the hill. The hill right above Alberta Falls is AWESOME sliding.)
There's a clearing right before you make the turn to walk along Glacier Creek that has turned into a mess, not because of the snow conditions but because so many people haven't known which way to go that it's turned into a mass of social trails. There are probably seven or eight trails leading off the real path - none of those are as well-traveled as the true trail, so as long as you're keeping in mind that you need to keep an eye out for the 90-degree right turn going up, and keep an eye out for a 90-degree left turn that also goes up (which I think was the confusing part coming back) you should be OK. Here's a map of the problem spot - as you can see, I went quite a ways off the correct path and had to come back.

Travel above Alberta Falls currently requires snowshoes. I fell through the snow several times and ended up breaking one of my hiking poles (didn't have snow baskets) where you can see the 1-mile mark. I thought about leaving it there as a warning to future hikers but figured Igloo Ed would find it and beat me over the head with it. I lost one of the halves anyway somewhere on the way down.
The trail from Glacier Gorge Junction back to Bear Lake is navigable without snowshoes, but it was starting to get mushy. The snow levels are still high where the trail starts to go up to Emerald Lake.
#6
Posted 31 May 2011 - 02:13 PM
Anyone have any predictions? Weather sites say RMNP in the high 50s and low 60s. I think these are Bear Lake predictions, since it has Estes in the 60s and 70s. So this looks like a big melt, and LOTS of water. But so much hard packed snow on trails, I'm guessing it will still be icey hardpack anywhere above Nymph Lake or Alberta Falls even if it gets to 80! Oh, well, Fun to watch the college kids in shorts and Reeboks hit the snowbanks.
Given the quickly changing conditions, I guess I'll pack EVERYTHING, including the snowshoes and gaiters. Sigh.
#7
Posted 31 May 2011 - 02:23 PM
The Loch a week ago. 1st photo is the trail to the Loch. Probably still 30ft of snow. 2nd photo is crossing The Loch. As you can see, lots of snow.

#8
Posted 01 June 2011 - 10:11 AM

The way up to Lake of Glass , the summer route seemed impassable to us as we saw cornices covering the ridge just above the bowl and it WAS definatley sliding and rocks falls were heard the whole time we were up in that area.

We headed up the South/East slope (L) well above the bowl.. it was steep but doable.

I have a video of a snow/rock slide but haven't uploaded it yet.. it was awesome to catch..
with the temps rising in the 90's in the plains.. and 60's with wind up high.. the snow will cascade off the mountains for sure here's one we didn't get to see fall, but I am sure it will or has... it covered the Andrews/Icy Brook valley.
#9
Posted 01 June 2011 - 06:40 PM
The good news about that is, the first half mile of the Longs Peak Trail is mostly clear. The kids and I decided to forgo tackling Longs Peak today ;)
#10
Posted 04 June 2011 - 06:07 PM
#11
Posted 12 June 2011 - 01:25 PM
I meant 10,700 instead of 9700 feet.
ALooneyGuy, on 12 June 2011 - 01:23 PM, said:
#12
Posted 13 June 2011 - 01:32 PM
#13
Posted 13 June 2011 - 04:00 PM
#14
Posted 14 June 2011 - 11:14 AM
Pics and more info here.
#15
Posted 14 June 2011 - 11:31 AM
Thank you for the report.
Becky J.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




This topic is locked









